|
Zymo Research
d6310 D6310, supplied by Zymo Research, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/d6310/product/Zymo Research Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
d6310 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-03
95/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Zymo Research
isolated dna standard Isolated Dna Standard, supplied by Zymo Research, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/isolated dna standard/product/Zymo Research Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
isolated dna standard - by Bioz Stars,
2026-03
96/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Zymo Research
gut cell microbiome standard Gut Cell Microbiome Standard, supplied by Zymo Research, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/gut cell microbiome standard/product/Zymo Research Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gut cell microbiome standard - by Bioz Stars,
2026-03
97/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Zymo Research
standard ii Standard Ii, supplied by Zymo Research, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/standard ii/product/Zymo Research Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
standard ii - by Bioz Stars,
2026-03
94/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Zymo Research
sequencing controls Sequencing Controls, supplied by Zymo Research, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/sequencing controls/product/Zymo Research Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
sequencing controls - by Bioz Stars,
2026-03
99/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Zymo Research
mock communities Mock Communities, supplied by Zymo Research, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/mock communities/product/Zymo Research Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mock communities - by Bioz Stars,
2026-03
99/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Zymo Research
microbiome analysis Microbiome Analysis, supplied by Zymo Research, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/microbiome analysis/product/Zymo Research Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
microbiome analysis - by Bioz Stars,
2026-03
99/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Zymo Research
gut microbiome standard ![]() Gut Microbiome Standard, supplied by Zymo Research, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/gut microbiome standard/product/Zymo Research Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gut microbiome standard - by Bioz Stars,
2026-03
86/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Zymo Research
zymobiomics microbial community standard ![]() Zymobiomics Microbial Community Standard, supplied by Zymo Research, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/zymobiomics microbial community standard/product/Zymo Research Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
zymobiomics microbial community standard - by Bioz Stars,
2026-03
96/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Zymo Research
microbiome preservative reagent dna rna shield ![]() Microbiome Preservative Reagent Dna Rna Shield, supplied by Zymo Research, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/microbiome preservative reagent dna rna shield/product/Zymo Research Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
microbiome preservative reagent dna rna shield - by Bioz Stars,
2026-03
99/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
BEI Resources
mock microbial community gdna v5.2h ![]() Mock Microbial Community Gdna V5.2h, supplied by BEI Resources, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/mock microbial community gdna v5.2h/product/BEI Resources Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mock microbial community gdna v5.2h - by Bioz Stars,
2026-03
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
Image Search Results
Journal: bioRxiv
Article Title: MetaGut: Insights into gut microbiomes in stem cell transplantation by comprehensive shotgun long-read sequencing
doi: 10.1101/2023.03.10.531901
Figure Lengend Snippet: The Figure shows a) the positions of pre-Tx and control samples, displayed as colored dots, in the joint PCoA space of all samples, as well as the positions of pre-Tx Cluster 1, Cluster 2, and Cluster 3 in PCoA space (shaded areas), b) bar plots visualizing the microbiome compositions of healthy control and pre-Tx alloHSCT samples, stratified by pre-Tx cluster membership, and c) the rate of reads that carry an ARG element, separately for control and pre-Tx alloHSCT samples and stratified by pre-Tx cluster membership. The bar plots show the 20 genera that attained the highest aggregated sum of frequency across all time points, and, of these, within each sample, only the genera that 1.) were assigned at least 20 reads to and 2.) passed the mapping-based taxon validation step of MetaGut were depicted. The combined abundances of genera with fewer than 20 reads is shown in the category “not enough reads”; the category “not validated” shows the combined abundances of genera with more than 20 Kraken2-assigned reads that did not pass the mapping-based taxon validation step of MetaGut. Sample labels below the bar plots specify patient or control sample ID, followed, for alloHSCT samples, by the day of sampling relative to the stem cell transplantation time point.
Article Snippet: Theoretical composition of the
Techniques: Sampling, Transplantation Assay
Journal: bioRxiv
Article Title: MetaGut: Insights into gut microbiomes in stem cell transplantation by comprehensive shotgun long-read sequencing
doi: 10.1101/2023.03.10.531901
Figure Lengend Snippet: Shown are, for each sample, bar plots that visualize the respective compositions of the bacterial, fungal, archaeal, DNA-viral, and non-fungal eukaryotic components of the sample microbiome. Normalization was applied independently to each bar plot. The bar plots only show the 20 (for bacteria, fungi and DNA viruses), 4 (for archaea), and 2 (for non-fungal eukaryotes) genera that attained the highest mean relative frequency within the considered taxonomic category across all timepoints, and, of these, within each sample, only the genera that a) were assigned at least 20 reads by Kraken2, and b) passed the mapping-based taxon validation step of MetaGut. The combined abundance of genera within each taxonomic category with fewer than 20 reads is shown in the category “not enough reads”; the category “not validated” shows the combined abundance of genera with more than 20 reads that did not pass the mapping-based validation step. Sample labels below the bar plots specify healthy control ID or the patient ID, followed by the day of sampling relative to the transplantation event.
Article Snippet: Theoretical composition of the
Techniques: Sampling, Transplantation Assay
Journal: bioRxiv
Article Title: MetaGut: Insights into gut microbiomes in stem cell transplantation by comprehensive shotgun long-read sequencing
doi: 10.1101/2023.03.10.531901
Figure Lengend Snippet: The Figure shows, for alloHSCT samples collected during the leukopenic period, a) sample positions in the joint PCoA space of all samples, b) bar plots visualizing sample microbiome compositions, and c) rates of reads carrying an ARG element. All visualizations are stratified by pre-Tx cluster membership of the corresponding patients; in the top panel, pre-Tx cluster membership is indicated by dot color. The bar plots show the 20 genera that attained the highest mean frequency across all time points, and, of these, within each sample, only the genera that 1.) were assigned at least 20 reads and 2.) passed the mapping-based taxon validation step of MetaGut were depicted. The combined abundance of genera with fewer than 20 reads is shown in the category “not enough reads”; the category “not validated” shows the combined abundance of genera with more than 20 Kraken2-assigned reads that did not pass the mapping-based validation step. Sample labels below the bar plots specify patient ID, followed by the day of sampling relative to the stem cell transplantation time point.
Article Snippet: Theoretical composition of the
Techniques: Sampling, Transplantation Assay
Journal: bioRxiv
Article Title: MetaGut: Insights into gut microbiomes in stem cell transplantation by comprehensive shotgun long-read sequencing
doi: 10.1101/2023.03.10.531901
Figure Lengend Snippet: The figure shows, for alloHSCT samples collected during the reconstitution period, a) sample positions in the joint PCoA space of all samples, b) bar plots visualizing sample microbiome compositions, and c) rates of reads carrying an ARG element. All visualizations are stratified by pre-Tx cluster membership of the corresponding patients; in the top panel, pre-Tx cluster membership is indicated by dot color. The bar plots show the 20 genera that attained the highest mean frequency across all time points, and, of these, within each sample, only the genera that 1.) were assigned at least 20 reads and 2.) passed the mapping-based taxon validation step of MetaGut were depicted. The combined abundance of genera with fewer than 20 reads is shown in the category “not enough reads”; the category “not validated” shows the combined abundance of genera with more than 20 Kraken2-assigned reads that did not pass the mapping-based validation step. Sample labels below the bar plots specify patient ID, followed by the day of sampling relative to the stem cell transplantation time point.
Article Snippet: Theoretical composition of the
Techniques: Sampling, Transplantation Assay