zymo mock microbial community Search Results


95
Zymo Research d6310
D6310, supplied by Zymo Research, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/d6310/product/Zymo Research
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
d6310 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Zymo Research isolated dna standard
Isolated Dna Standard, supplied by Zymo Research, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/isolated dna standard/product/Zymo Research
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
isolated dna standard - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

97
Zymo Research gut cell microbiome standard
Gut Cell Microbiome Standard, supplied by Zymo Research, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/gut cell microbiome standard/product/Zymo Research
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gut cell microbiome standard - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Zymo Research standard ii
Standard Ii, supplied by Zymo Research, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/standard ii/product/Zymo Research
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
standard ii - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Zymo Research sequencing controls
Sequencing Controls, supplied by Zymo Research, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/sequencing controls/product/Zymo Research
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
sequencing controls - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Zymo Research mock communities
Mock Communities, supplied by Zymo Research, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mock communities/product/Zymo Research
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mock communities - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Zymo Research microbiome analysis
Microbiome Analysis, supplied by Zymo Research, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/microbiome analysis/product/Zymo Research
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
microbiome analysis - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Zymo Research gut microbiome standard
The Figure shows a) the positions of pre-Tx and control samples, displayed as colored dots, in the joint PCoA space of all samples, as well as the positions of pre-Tx Cluster 1, Cluster 2, and Cluster 3 in PCoA space (shaded areas), b) bar plots visualizing the <t>microbiome</t> compositions of healthy control and pre-Tx alloHSCT samples, stratified by pre-Tx cluster membership, and c) the rate of reads that carry an ARG element, separately for control and pre-Tx alloHSCT samples and stratified by pre-Tx cluster membership. The bar plots show the 20 genera that attained the highest aggregated sum of frequency across all time points, and, of these, within each sample, only the genera that 1.) were assigned at least 20 reads to and 2.) passed the mapping-based taxon validation step of MetaGut were depicted. The combined abundances of genera with fewer than 20 reads is shown in the category “not enough reads”; the category “not validated” shows the combined abundances of genera with more than 20 Kraken2-assigned reads that did not pass the mapping-based taxon validation step of MetaGut. Sample labels below the bar plots specify patient or control sample ID, followed, for alloHSCT samples, by the day of sampling relative to the stem cell transplantation time point.
Gut Microbiome Standard, supplied by Zymo Research, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/gut microbiome standard/product/Zymo Research
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gut microbiome standard - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Zymo Research zymobiomics microbial community standard
The Figure shows a) the positions of pre-Tx and control samples, displayed as colored dots, in the joint PCoA space of all samples, as well as the positions of pre-Tx Cluster 1, Cluster 2, and Cluster 3 in PCoA space (shaded areas), b) bar plots visualizing the <t>microbiome</t> compositions of healthy control and pre-Tx alloHSCT samples, stratified by pre-Tx cluster membership, and c) the rate of reads that carry an ARG element, separately for control and pre-Tx alloHSCT samples and stratified by pre-Tx cluster membership. The bar plots show the 20 genera that attained the highest aggregated sum of frequency across all time points, and, of these, within each sample, only the genera that 1.) were assigned at least 20 reads to and 2.) passed the mapping-based taxon validation step of MetaGut were depicted. The combined abundances of genera with fewer than 20 reads is shown in the category “not enough reads”; the category “not validated” shows the combined abundances of genera with more than 20 Kraken2-assigned reads that did not pass the mapping-based taxon validation step of MetaGut. Sample labels below the bar plots specify patient or control sample ID, followed, for alloHSCT samples, by the day of sampling relative to the stem cell transplantation time point.
Zymobiomics Microbial Community Standard, supplied by Zymo Research, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/zymobiomics microbial community standard/product/Zymo Research
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
zymobiomics microbial community standard - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Zymo Research microbiome preservative reagent dna rna shield
The Figure shows a) the positions of pre-Tx and control samples, displayed as colored dots, in the joint PCoA space of all samples, as well as the positions of pre-Tx Cluster 1, Cluster 2, and Cluster 3 in PCoA space (shaded areas), b) bar plots visualizing the <t>microbiome</t> compositions of healthy control and pre-Tx alloHSCT samples, stratified by pre-Tx cluster membership, and c) the rate of reads that carry an ARG element, separately for control and pre-Tx alloHSCT samples and stratified by pre-Tx cluster membership. The bar plots show the 20 genera that attained the highest aggregated sum of frequency across all time points, and, of these, within each sample, only the genera that 1.) were assigned at least 20 reads to and 2.) passed the mapping-based taxon validation step of MetaGut were depicted. The combined abundances of genera with fewer than 20 reads is shown in the category “not enough reads”; the category “not validated” shows the combined abundances of genera with more than 20 Kraken2-assigned reads that did not pass the mapping-based taxon validation step of MetaGut. Sample labels below the bar plots specify patient or control sample ID, followed, for alloHSCT samples, by the day of sampling relative to the stem cell transplantation time point.
Microbiome Preservative Reagent Dna Rna Shield, supplied by Zymo Research, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/microbiome preservative reagent dna rna shield/product/Zymo Research
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
microbiome preservative reagent dna rna shield - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
BEI Resources mock microbial community gdna v5.2h
The Figure shows a) the positions of pre-Tx and control samples, displayed as colored dots, in the joint PCoA space of all samples, as well as the positions of pre-Tx Cluster 1, Cluster 2, and Cluster 3 in PCoA space (shaded areas), b) bar plots visualizing the <t>microbiome</t> compositions of healthy control and pre-Tx alloHSCT samples, stratified by pre-Tx cluster membership, and c) the rate of reads that carry an ARG element, separately for control and pre-Tx alloHSCT samples and stratified by pre-Tx cluster membership. The bar plots show the 20 genera that attained the highest aggregated sum of frequency across all time points, and, of these, within each sample, only the genera that 1.) were assigned at least 20 reads to and 2.) passed the mapping-based taxon validation step of MetaGut were depicted. The combined abundances of genera with fewer than 20 reads is shown in the category “not enough reads”; the category “not validated” shows the combined abundances of genera with more than 20 Kraken2-assigned reads that did not pass the mapping-based taxon validation step of MetaGut. Sample labels below the bar plots specify patient or control sample ID, followed, for alloHSCT samples, by the day of sampling relative to the stem cell transplantation time point.
Mock Microbial Community Gdna V5.2h, supplied by BEI Resources, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mock microbial community gdna v5.2h/product/BEI Resources
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mock microbial community gdna v5.2h - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


The Figure shows a) the positions of pre-Tx and control samples, displayed as colored dots, in the joint PCoA space of all samples, as well as the positions of pre-Tx Cluster 1, Cluster 2, and Cluster 3 in PCoA space (shaded areas), b) bar plots visualizing the microbiome compositions of healthy control and pre-Tx alloHSCT samples, stratified by pre-Tx cluster membership, and c) the rate of reads that carry an ARG element, separately for control and pre-Tx alloHSCT samples and stratified by pre-Tx cluster membership. The bar plots show the 20 genera that attained the highest aggregated sum of frequency across all time points, and, of these, within each sample, only the genera that 1.) were assigned at least 20 reads to and 2.) passed the mapping-based taxon validation step of MetaGut were depicted. The combined abundances of genera with fewer than 20 reads is shown in the category “not enough reads”; the category “not validated” shows the combined abundances of genera with more than 20 Kraken2-assigned reads that did not pass the mapping-based taxon validation step of MetaGut. Sample labels below the bar plots specify patient or control sample ID, followed, for alloHSCT samples, by the day of sampling relative to the stem cell transplantation time point.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: MetaGut: Insights into gut microbiomes in stem cell transplantation by comprehensive shotgun long-read sequencing

doi: 10.1101/2023.03.10.531901

Figure Lengend Snippet: The Figure shows a) the positions of pre-Tx and control samples, displayed as colored dots, in the joint PCoA space of all samples, as well as the positions of pre-Tx Cluster 1, Cluster 2, and Cluster 3 in PCoA space (shaded areas), b) bar plots visualizing the microbiome compositions of healthy control and pre-Tx alloHSCT samples, stratified by pre-Tx cluster membership, and c) the rate of reads that carry an ARG element, separately for control and pre-Tx alloHSCT samples and stratified by pre-Tx cluster membership. The bar plots show the 20 genera that attained the highest aggregated sum of frequency across all time points, and, of these, within each sample, only the genera that 1.) were assigned at least 20 reads to and 2.) passed the mapping-based taxon validation step of MetaGut were depicted. The combined abundances of genera with fewer than 20 reads is shown in the category “not enough reads”; the category “not validated” shows the combined abundances of genera with more than 20 Kraken2-assigned reads that did not pass the mapping-based taxon validation step of MetaGut. Sample labels below the bar plots specify patient or control sample ID, followed, for alloHSCT samples, by the day of sampling relative to the stem cell transplantation time point.

Article Snippet: Theoretical composition of the “Zymo Gut Microbiome Standard” as well as abundances based on Kraken2 mappings to our comprehensive database as well as Minimap2 based mapping to the references provided by Zymo (using one estimate based on read counts and a second estimate based on nucleotide counts).

Techniques: Sampling, Transplantation Assay

Shown are, for each sample, bar plots that visualize the respective compositions of the bacterial, fungal, archaeal, DNA-viral, and non-fungal eukaryotic components of the sample microbiome. Normalization was applied independently to each bar plot. The bar plots only show the 20 (for bacteria, fungi and DNA viruses), 4 (for archaea), and 2 (for non-fungal eukaryotes) genera that attained the highest mean relative frequency within the considered taxonomic category across all timepoints, and, of these, within each sample, only the genera that a) were assigned at least 20 reads by Kraken2, and b) passed the mapping-based taxon validation step of MetaGut. The combined abundance of genera within each taxonomic category with fewer than 20 reads is shown in the category “not enough reads”; the category “not validated” shows the combined abundance of genera with more than 20 reads that did not pass the mapping-based validation step. Sample labels below the bar plots specify healthy control ID or the patient ID, followed by the day of sampling relative to the transplantation event.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: MetaGut: Insights into gut microbiomes in stem cell transplantation by comprehensive shotgun long-read sequencing

doi: 10.1101/2023.03.10.531901

Figure Lengend Snippet: Shown are, for each sample, bar plots that visualize the respective compositions of the bacterial, fungal, archaeal, DNA-viral, and non-fungal eukaryotic components of the sample microbiome. Normalization was applied independently to each bar plot. The bar plots only show the 20 (for bacteria, fungi and DNA viruses), 4 (for archaea), and 2 (for non-fungal eukaryotes) genera that attained the highest mean relative frequency within the considered taxonomic category across all timepoints, and, of these, within each sample, only the genera that a) were assigned at least 20 reads by Kraken2, and b) passed the mapping-based taxon validation step of MetaGut. The combined abundance of genera within each taxonomic category with fewer than 20 reads is shown in the category “not enough reads”; the category “not validated” shows the combined abundance of genera with more than 20 reads that did not pass the mapping-based validation step. Sample labels below the bar plots specify healthy control ID or the patient ID, followed by the day of sampling relative to the transplantation event.

Article Snippet: Theoretical composition of the “Zymo Gut Microbiome Standard” as well as abundances based on Kraken2 mappings to our comprehensive database as well as Minimap2 based mapping to the references provided by Zymo (using one estimate based on read counts and a second estimate based on nucleotide counts).

Techniques: Sampling, Transplantation Assay

The Figure shows, for alloHSCT samples collected during the leukopenic period, a) sample positions in the joint PCoA space of all samples, b) bar plots visualizing sample microbiome compositions, and c) rates of reads carrying an ARG element. All visualizations are stratified by pre-Tx cluster membership of the corresponding patients; in the top panel, pre-Tx cluster membership is indicated by dot color. The bar plots show the 20 genera that attained the highest mean frequency across all time points, and, of these, within each sample, only the genera that 1.) were assigned at least 20 reads and 2.) passed the mapping-based taxon validation step of MetaGut were depicted. The combined abundance of genera with fewer than 20 reads is shown in the category “not enough reads”; the category “not validated” shows the combined abundance of genera with more than 20 Kraken2-assigned reads that did not pass the mapping-based validation step. Sample labels below the bar plots specify patient ID, followed by the day of sampling relative to the stem cell transplantation time point.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: MetaGut: Insights into gut microbiomes in stem cell transplantation by comprehensive shotgun long-read sequencing

doi: 10.1101/2023.03.10.531901

Figure Lengend Snippet: The Figure shows, for alloHSCT samples collected during the leukopenic period, a) sample positions in the joint PCoA space of all samples, b) bar plots visualizing sample microbiome compositions, and c) rates of reads carrying an ARG element. All visualizations are stratified by pre-Tx cluster membership of the corresponding patients; in the top panel, pre-Tx cluster membership is indicated by dot color. The bar plots show the 20 genera that attained the highest mean frequency across all time points, and, of these, within each sample, only the genera that 1.) were assigned at least 20 reads and 2.) passed the mapping-based taxon validation step of MetaGut were depicted. The combined abundance of genera with fewer than 20 reads is shown in the category “not enough reads”; the category “not validated” shows the combined abundance of genera with more than 20 Kraken2-assigned reads that did not pass the mapping-based validation step. Sample labels below the bar plots specify patient ID, followed by the day of sampling relative to the stem cell transplantation time point.

Article Snippet: Theoretical composition of the “Zymo Gut Microbiome Standard” as well as abundances based on Kraken2 mappings to our comprehensive database as well as Minimap2 based mapping to the references provided by Zymo (using one estimate based on read counts and a second estimate based on nucleotide counts).

Techniques: Sampling, Transplantation Assay

The figure shows, for alloHSCT samples collected during the reconstitution period, a) sample positions in the joint PCoA space of all samples, b) bar plots visualizing sample microbiome compositions, and c) rates of reads carrying an ARG element. All visualizations are stratified by pre-Tx cluster membership of the corresponding patients; in the top panel, pre-Tx cluster membership is indicated by dot color. The bar plots show the 20 genera that attained the highest mean frequency across all time points, and, of these, within each sample, only the genera that 1.) were assigned at least 20 reads and 2.) passed the mapping-based taxon validation step of MetaGut were depicted. The combined abundance of genera with fewer than 20 reads is shown in the category “not enough reads”; the category “not validated” shows the combined abundance of genera with more than 20 Kraken2-assigned reads that did not pass the mapping-based validation step. Sample labels below the bar plots specify patient ID, followed by the day of sampling relative to the stem cell transplantation time point.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: MetaGut: Insights into gut microbiomes in stem cell transplantation by comprehensive shotgun long-read sequencing

doi: 10.1101/2023.03.10.531901

Figure Lengend Snippet: The figure shows, for alloHSCT samples collected during the reconstitution period, a) sample positions in the joint PCoA space of all samples, b) bar plots visualizing sample microbiome compositions, and c) rates of reads carrying an ARG element. All visualizations are stratified by pre-Tx cluster membership of the corresponding patients; in the top panel, pre-Tx cluster membership is indicated by dot color. The bar plots show the 20 genera that attained the highest mean frequency across all time points, and, of these, within each sample, only the genera that 1.) were assigned at least 20 reads and 2.) passed the mapping-based taxon validation step of MetaGut were depicted. The combined abundance of genera with fewer than 20 reads is shown in the category “not enough reads”; the category “not validated” shows the combined abundance of genera with more than 20 Kraken2-assigned reads that did not pass the mapping-based validation step. Sample labels below the bar plots specify patient ID, followed by the day of sampling relative to the stem cell transplantation time point.

Article Snippet: Theoretical composition of the “Zymo Gut Microbiome Standard” as well as abundances based on Kraken2 mappings to our comprehensive database as well as Minimap2 based mapping to the references provided by Zymo (using one estimate based on read counts and a second estimate based on nucleotide counts).

Techniques: Sampling, Transplantation Assay